Sustainable Building
 .  Sourcebook
 .  Real Estate
 .  Professionals Directory
 .  Calendar
 .  Conferences
 .  Green Building Links
 .  Case Studies

Sustainable Reading
 .  Bookstore
 .  Articles

Sustainable Tourism
 .  Eco Travel in Latin America



Sustainable Sources
provides:

Web Services
 .  Design
 .  Hosting
 .  FTP Access
 .  Domain Names
 .  E-Commerce
 .  Calendars
 .  Searchable Databases
 .  Search Engines
 .  Discussion Forums
 .  Webmaster Tips



Translate these pages



Contact Our Webmaster

Building Sources Sustainable Building Calendar Green Building Professionals Directory Green Real Estate Sustainable Building Bookstore Web Design and Hosting Services

 

Sustainable Sources Logo

GEOEXCHANGE SYSTEMS

The New HVAC Technology

Notes

So often when new technologies develop, the application of the technology swiftly outgrows the original intention. The result many times is that the original terms for equipment linger long after the terms become inappropriate. (Remember calling a refrigerator an "Ice Box".) A prime example is GeoExchange technology for conditioned living space.

Within this relatively obscure technology are several terms which are inappropriate:

  1. Ground Source Heat Pump
    A Ground Source Heat Pump utilizes the earth for both a source of heat, and a heat sink. In the winter, the earth is used as a source of heat; in the summer the earth is used as a heat sink. Therefore, the more appropriate term is Ground Exchange Heat Pump, or more simply GeoExchange Heat Pump (GHP).
  2. Geothermal Heat Pump
    Geothermal is an inappropriate term because it can be confused with geothermal sources. There are several installations in the U.S. where raw natural geothermal heat is used to produce electrical energy. Examples of geothermal energy are geysers and naturally occurring hot springs.
  3. Water Source Heat Pump
    Water Source Heat Pump is actually a very accurate term for almost all GeoExchange Heat Pumps. Unfortunately, using the term creates confusion with systems that use water as the primary conditioning medium, such as large commercial buildings that use chilled water for air conditioning. Also, technically the "water" used is almost always a mixture of an antifreeze liquid and water (closed loop systems).
  4. Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER)
    Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) for a refrigerant type air conditioner (or heat pump in cooling mode) is defined as Btu/h divided by kilowatt input. The EER (and its cousin SEER) is used by manufacturers to provide an efficiency benchmark of a particular unit. However, it must be understood that the EER is only valid for a given set of parameters. These parameters include outside temperature and relative humidity for air source equipment. As outside temperatures rise above the manufacturer's parameter (typically 95° F), the actual EER drops off significantly from the "rated" value. Typically, an EER can drop 20% if outside temperature increases to 110°F. (Also, available BTU output of the unit drops dramatically as temps increase over 95°F.) For this reason, it is inappropriate to compare a GeoExchange Heat Pump to a conventional refrigerant type air conditioner, or to an air source heat pump.
  5. Coefficient of Performance (COP)
    The Coefficient of Performance (COP) is a useful benchmark for comparing heating units. It is defined as the BTU/hr output divided by kilowatt input, times a conversionfactor of 0.293. The conversion factor yields a result that is dimensionless and represents a true efficiency. Typical values for heat pumps are 3.0 — 4.0. As is the case with the EER number, the COP is also inappropriate for comparisons between GHP's and air source heat pumps. The reason is the same as for the EER number. That is, the COP for air source heat pumps is based upon a given set of parameters. These parameters include outside air temperature. Again, as outside air temperature gets colder, the actual COP lowers. With a GHP, outside air temperature has no effect on COP. This argument is noted in the 2000 ASHRAE Handbook, S7.33: "The normal procedure for evaluating COP does not provide a workable method for comparing efficiencies of dissimilar energy streams. Instead, each energy stream should be valued on the same energy basis..."

Graphics for this article provided by:

Geothermal Heat Pump Consortium
http://www.ghpc.org


Back to Sourcebook Contents